Abstract:
Background. Prophylactic and empirical antibiotic use is essential in cancer patients due to the underlying immune deficiencies.
We examined the spectrum of causative bacteria and the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic prescription for three selected
infections in cancer patients. Methodology. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the National Institute of Cancer
(NIC), Sri Lanka, from June 2018 to February 2019. Bacterial isolates obtained from adult cancer patients with a diagnosis of lower
respiratory tract infections (LRTI), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), or urinary tract infections (UTI) were included.
Causative bacteria were identified and the antibiotic susceptibility was determined by standard microbiological methods.
Empirical therapy was defined as appropriate if the isolated pathogen was susceptible in vitro to the given antibiotic. Results. A
total of 155 bacterial isolates were included in the analysis. LRTI were the most prevalent infections (37.2%, 55/148) encountered
during the study period. Majority (90.9%) of the isolated bacteria were ESKAPE pathogens. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most
frequent pathogen causing LRTI (42.4%, 25/59), whereas Escherichia coli (32%, 16/50) and Staphylococcus aureus (26.1%, 12/46)
predominated in UTI and SSTI, respectively. Meropenem was the most prescribed empirical antibiotic for LRTI (29.1%, 16/55)
and SSTI (26.6%, 11/43) while it was ceftazidime for UTI (36%, 18/50). Only 20.6% (32/155) of the isolated bacteria were
susceptible to the empirical antibiotic prescribed while 48.4% (75/155) were resistant to them. (e prescribed empirical antibiotic
did not have the spectrum of activity for the isolated bacteria in 29% (45/155) of cases. Conclusion. High resistance rates were
observed against the prescribed empirical antibiotics. National empirical antibiotic guidelines should be revised with updated data
on causative organisms and their susceptibility patterns to ensure appropriate empirical antibiotic prescription
