DSpace Repository

PERFORMANCE OF TEAK IN RESPONSE TO CLIMATE & SELECTED SOIL FACTORS

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dulanga, H.R.
dc.contributor.author Subasinghe, S.M.C.U.P.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-10T10:29:45Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-10T10:29:45Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Dulanga, H.R., Subasinghe, S.M.C.U.P. (2016). "PERFORMANCE OF TEAK IN RESPONSE TO CLIMATE & SELECTED SOIL FACTORS", 73 P. en_US, si_LK
dc.identifier.uri http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/5792
dc.description.abstract Attached en_US, si_LK
dc.description.abstract Tree growth rate is the most important variable in commercial forestry because most of the important management decisions are taken on the growth rate of trees. There are a number of factors controlling the distribution and growth of teak. The important factors are rainfall/soil moisture, temperature, light, geological formation and soil conditions. To investigate factors affecting growth rate on teak plantations, Climatic and soil factors were analysed on two teak monoculture plantations located in Monaragala and Puttalam districts which are two different geographical areas in Sri Lanka. Sixteen permanent sample plots which were demarcated on 2009 in both plantations were used and the growth parameters, i.e., height and diameter at breast height were measured. To assess the soil conditions in both plantation, undisturbed soil samples were taken from each permanent plot and soil pH, total Nitrogen content, Phosphorous content, Potassium content, Calcium content and Magnesium contents were measured as chemical analysis. Soil bulk density, soil water holding capacity and soil textures were analysed as physical tests. Geographical area is highly effect on growth rate of teak with result of the growth comparison in two plantations. There is no straight line relationship between growth and climate conditions in both plantations. The significant differences of soil conditions between plantation and within plantation were identified. Soil pH range varies within 5.765±0.005 to 6.651 ±0.039 in both plantation is the best pH condition for the teak plantations. Mean water holding capacity of Puttalam (27.669±1.460%) is lower than the Kumaragama (32.215± 1.570%) plantation, mean soil bulk density in Puttalam (0.34713±0.0 1681 gcm') is higher than the bulk density .in Kumaragama (0.32275±O.O 1299 gcm'), mean soil Magnesium content in Puttalam (4.276±0.44 ugml') is higher than Magnesium content in Kumaragama (4.1483±0.22 - ugml"), mean Phosphorus content in Kumaragama (7.58±4.64 ppm) is higher than Phosphorus content in Puttalam (6.3 I±5.32 ppm) and mean Nitrogen content in Puttalam (2.925± 1.360 ppm) is higher than Nitrogen content in Kumaragama (1.450±0.366 ppm). These significant differences or soil conditions between two plantations can hjghly influence on teak growth rates in Puualarn and Kumaragama. Particularly, the higher WHC and lower SO of Kumaragama plantation may influence for growth difference of two plantations.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US, si_LK
dc.subject Teak en_US, si_LK
dc.subject Growth rate en_US, si_LK
dc.subject Soil en_US, si_LK
dc.subject Climatic conditions en_US, si_LK
dc.title PERFORMANCE OF TEAK IN RESPONSE TO CLIMATE & SELECTED SOIL FACTORS en_US, si_LK
dc.type Article en_US, si_LK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account