dc.contributor.author |
De Silva, L.D.G.G. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Somaratne, V. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Senaratne, S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Vipuladasa, M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ranasinghe, S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wickremasinghe, R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-11-03T06:47:08Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-11-03T06:47:08Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
De Silva, L.D.G.G., Somaratne, V., Senaratne, S., Vipuladasa, M., Ranasinghe, S., Wickremasinghe, R. (2016). "Diagnosis of suspected cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions with rapid diagnostic test and slit skin smear- a comparative study", Proceedings of the 72nd Annual Sessions - 2016, Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science, p. 02 |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6464 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Attached |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.description.abstract |
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), a neglected vector borne tropical infection which causes nonhealing skin lesions, is a newly emerged and established disease in Sri Lanka. The main
diagnostic technique available for leishmaniasis is skin slit smears (SSS) which is less costly and
most commonly used method in laboratories to identify Leishmania amastigotes (LD bodies),
which has the reported sensitivity between 35-60%. Since this does not warrant adequate
accuracy for the detection of the disease, the aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity
and the specificity of a newly introduced commercially available Rapid Diagnosis Test (RDT) to
detect Leishmania antigen in CL lesions w ith SSS.
Following w ritten informed consent, eighty seven patients with clinically suggestive CL lesions
w ere subjected to parasitological investigations. Slit skin smear was perform ed in duplicate for
all the 87 suspected cases. Parasite count of SSS was obtained in different clinical
manifestations in accordance with the W HO grading by double blind method.
In SSS, 49 (56.32% ) w ere positive for LD bodies in suspected CL lesions. RDT w ere positive only
on 24 lesions (27.58%). M ost of the samples that were positive by RDT had a parasite count of
£2+, which may suggest that patien .s w ith less than <2+ parasitemia may not be detectable by
the RDT. These results indicate that the sensitivity of RDT was only 48.9%. This study implies
th at RDT is positive only with a high parasite count and therefore cannot be recommended to
be used to diagnose leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka in patients with a low parasitaemia. |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.publisher |
Proceedings of the 72nd Annual Sessions - 2016, Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.subject |
Cutaneous leishmaniasis |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.subject |
skin slit smears |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.subject |
Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.title |
Diagnosis of suspected cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions with rapid diagnostic test and slit skin smear- a comparative study |
en_US, si_LK |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US, si_LK |