attached
Background: DMD is characte rrzed by muscle degeneration, developmental, behavioural
abnormalities with interpatient variability due to disparities in mutation patterns.
Objective: To ascertain variability in age of onset, development delay, behavioural abnormalities
(Initability) in respect to distal, proximal mutation patterns of dystrophin gene.
Method: Mutation detection comprised of Multiplex PCR (20 primers), and/or Multiple Ligation
Dependent probe Amplification (MLPA) of 75 clinically diagnot* ?MD patients; aged 3'8-
13yrs (mean age, g.6+).eyrs). Clinical datawere recorded via a Standard questionnaire.
Results: Genomic abrasions: intragenic deletions; n:5 aQz%); distal deletions n:47(59%) of
which n:42(89o/o) localized in the distal hotspot (45-53). Proximal deletions n:7(1I%).Mean
Age of Onset (vraOl (*p: 0.004); Distal deletions : 4.7+1.8yrs, Proximal deletions:
6.4*l.4yrs.
Gross motor developrnent delay- in distal deleted patients n:I6(34o/o), proximal n:3(42o/o)'
Behavioural 'abnormalities (Initability)-in distal deleted patients n:21(45%), proximal
n:l(l4Yo).
Exons 49,46,4i werefrequent distal mutations of patients with Gross motor development delay
and behavioural abnormalities.
Discussion and Conclusion:
As highlighted in literature, differential effects of different mutation sites on the expression of
dystro-phin isoforms in brain remain to be clarified. Brain specific dystrophin transcripts (dpl40'
apZfl, which are involved in cellular synaptogenesis, neural development, are disrupted due to
mutations in distal hotspot region. Thereby intellectual and development delay in toddlers may
be considered as an early identification of the risk for DMD. Muscle specific isoform @pa27m)
is disrupted by both Oistat and proximal mutations. This warrants an immunohistochemical
analysis of dystrophin isoform levels in muscle (mutations not accordance with reading frame
hypothesis) and brain tissue in respect to mutation patterns'
