dc.contributor.author |
Nandasena, G. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Silva, L.N.K. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kumara, K.K.W.A.S. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-12-06T05:22:29Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-12-06T05:22:29Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Nandasena, G., De Silva, L.N.K., Kumara, K.K.W.A.S., (2017)."Basic Rules of Aristotelian logic and Induction",American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS) Vol. 29, (1), pp. 263-270 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2313-4402 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7792 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
attached |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
We study comprehensive analysis of the inductive arguments done by various researchers. These researchers
have surveyed the basic concepts in logic such as statement, argument, premise, conclusion, deductive
argument, inductive argument, primitive terms and axioms. The fundamental laws of Aristotelian logic and
Hume's critique of induction are briefly discussed. We argue that all the basic rules of Aristotelian logic are
inductively obtained generalized abstract statements. Existence of undefined terms is also analyzed. We
conclude that every argument based on Aristotelian logic is a result of induction. |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Aristotelian logic |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Empirical World |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Reasoning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Argument |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Empiricism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Rationalism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Axiom |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Undefined Terms |
en_US |
dc.title |
Basic Rules of Aristotelian logic and Induction |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |